<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer ActiveX patch - not yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dynamicflash.com/2006/04/internet-explorer-activex-patch-not-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2006/04/internet-explorer-activex-patch-not-yet/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a serial code abuser</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2006/04/internet-explorer-activex-patch-not-yet/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicflash.com/2006/04/internet-explorer-activex-patch-not-yet/#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>I seem to remember reading somewhere that the 'compatability patch' was optional - so you have to know it exists and know that you want it in order to take advantage of it. Mainly for IT managers who have tons of workstations that they don't want to upgrade yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember reading somewhere that the &#8216;compatability patch&#8217; was optional - so you have to know it exists and know that you want it in order to take advantage of it. Mainly for IT managers who have tons of workstations that they don&#8217;t want to upgrade yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
