<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boolean operators and getter functions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a serial code abuser</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tangent</title>
		<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/macromedia-compiler-bug-boolean-operators-and-getter-functions/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Would (field1 &#124;&#124; field2) or ((field1) &#124;&#124; (field2)) help solve the issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would (field1 || field2) or ((field1) || (field2)) help solve the issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/macromedia-compiler-bug-boolean-operators-and-getter-functions/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think I've had that one too. It seems that the type checking routines in the compiler doesn't quite handle getters properly. It's particularly annoying because once you get around the type checking, the code actually works just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think I&#8217;ve had that one too. It seems that the type checking routines in the compiler doesn&#8217;t quite handle getters properly. It&#8217;s particularly annoying because once you get around the type checking, the code actually works just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/macromedia-compiler-bug-boolean-operators-and-getter-functions/#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I've run into a similar problem before, except I don't remember it being related to Booleans.  I seem to remember it involved the compiler flipping out about passing a getter into a function which wanted a string datatype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run into a similar problem before, except I don&#8217;t remember it being related to Booleans.  I seem to remember it involved the compiler flipping out about passing a getter into a function which wanted a string datatype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Neave</title>
		<link>http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/boolean-and-getters-bug/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Neave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamicflash.com/2005/04/macromedia-compiler-bug-boolean-operators-and-getter-functions/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Have you reported this bug to &lt;a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/" rel="nofollow"&gt;MM?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you reported this bug to <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/" rel="nofollow">MM?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
